An import tariff would increase the price of certain foreign-made goods.
Answer:
Contra account.
Explanation:
A contra account is an account that has an opposite of what is the normal balance for the class of such an account. a company would be able to report the original amount and in so doing also be able to report the reduction and then what is the net amount would be reported. in other words such an account is used to reduce the value of another related account. And thereafter the net value is what is going to be reported.
Answer: The answer is trade deficit.
Explanation: Balance of trade is represented by net exports (exports minus imports) and is usually influenced by factors that affect international trade. Those factors inflation include: inflation, natural endowment, exchange rate, trade policy, pandemics (e.g., coronavirus).
A trade surplus occurs when the value of a nation's exports is more than the value of its imports. However, trade deficit occurs when the opposite happens.
Answer:
Jobs argument
Explanation:
-The national-security argument states that some industries have to be protected by imposing tariffs to maintain the local production in case of a war.
-The unfair-competition argument says that the domestic market has to be protected when there is unfair competition because companies from other countries are subject to different regulations.
-Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument states that the threat of imposing a restriction can help to eliminate a restriction that was imposed by another country.
-Infant-industry argument says that new industries have to be protected because they don't have economies of scales that their competitors from others countries have.
-The jobs argument claims that the trade with other countries eliminates the local jobs.
According to this, the answer is that the senator is using the jobs argument to argue for the trade restriction on steel rods because he claims that it is necessary to impose those restrictions to protect the workers from losing their jobs.
Hello, yes it's actually common for people to give up their home to avoid further payment only if their lender agrees and allows that to happen. But of course, the remaining balance (the difference of the house value and what's left of the mortgage) must be paid. Walking away from an underwater mortgage can seriously affect that person's financial future and by extent his/her relationship with the community. His/Her credit score will go down with this, it may be difficult for him/her to qualify for another mortgage in the future. Another reason is that - in most states, it is completely legal for lenders to go after the difference (deficiency) because technically they own that and have rights to it.
