1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MakcuM [25]
3 years ago
11

Please help with this?​

History
2 answers:
Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

tatyana61 [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D bc it makes sense and it is correct. ( i had the same question in 6th grade.)

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was the perspective of Americans on the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan? Americans marched on Washington to protest Presiden
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

Americans backed President Carter's sanctions and embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics.

Explanation:

The perspective of Americans on the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan is that "Americans backed President Carter's sanctions and embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics."

Following the invasion of the Soviet Union on Afghanistan, the then United States President, Jimmy Carter, sanctions and placed embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics, many Americans supported the decision citing that the penalty exemplified commitment many Americans believe is right or justified to the cause of fighting the oppression, and anti-democratic Soviet Union's administration.

8 0
3 years ago
I have a Brainliest please help
BabaBlast [244]
The answer to the first question is A
the second question is B
the third question is B
the fourth question is C (I'm not sure)
3 0
3 years ago
The Industrial Revolution:
Alex Ar [27]
The industrial revolution helped with all of the above
6 0
3 years ago
BRAINLEST IF ANSWERED FIRST
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

I think it might be either B or C but I'm sure which one

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Evaluate the extent to which rulers of Indian states could exercise power independently from the British in the period 1750–1900
Leona [35]

Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under the British Rule.

Explanation:

The amount of power the ruler had over his dominion were nominal at best and their royalty was subject to the British as they could cite any reason and annex their land from them.

The amount of power the ruler had was also dependent on how closely the British were involved in their territory.

This was to be seen in places like Delhi and Calcutta where the British influence was more than in fringes  like Kerala and Orrissa where the King still had more power.

The power of the ruler was subject to the needs and interference of the British.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15650754#readmore

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • By 1800, the average size of american farms was _______ acres.
    7·1 answer
  • Plsss help will Mark brainliest rlly easy 5th grade
    7·2 answers
  • Mao zedong launched the cultural revolution because he believed that
    6·1 answer
  • What caused stagflation? Why could the Nixon-Ford-Carter crowd not solve this problem?
    15·1 answer
  • What have the colonists realized in the relationship between themselves and the king?
    7·1 answer
  • In this excerpt, President Abraham Lincoln expresses his view that-
    7·1 answer
  • What does the limited power of the Vice President suggest about how the Founding Fathers viewed the role?
    8·1 answer
  • Match each description to the correct civilization.
    13·1 answer
  • Why were Chinese scholar officals reluctant to adopt western ideas?
    5·1 answer
  • What is a reason why african american migration increased from the north to the south in the 1990s?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!