The summary of the political philosophy of John Locke is the dismissal of the divine right of kings and advocacy for natural rights.
<h3>Who was John Locke?</h3>
He was an English philosopher that was one of the fathers of Enlightenment thinking and considered the father of liberalism.
Hence, we can see that the divine right of kings was one that was popular in those times about the rulership rights that were transferred from generation to generation, but he advocated for natural rights.
Read more about John Locke here:
brainly.com/question/524736
#SPJ1
Are you good at science??
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
Because of the economical and military strength of the country.
