The purchase of low-quality materials would most likely the result of a favorable materials price variance coupled with an unfavorable material usage variance. Material price variance is the difference between the cost and the budgeted and actual cost to obtain an object or materials, multiply to the total amount of the product purchased. They are what you called positive value of direct material price and negative value of direct material price. A positive value of direct material price variance is the one that is favorable and it means that the direct material was purchased for a lesser price than the standard price. A negative value of direct material price variance is the one that is unfavorable and it means that more than the expected price per unit is paid.
We went for a drive, 2:30 in the morning
I kissed you, it was pouring
We held each other tight before the night was over
You looked over your shoulder
Oh, I was doing fine
You said, "Remember that night?
Remember that night?"
Oh, I was doing fine
You said, "Remember that night?
Remember that night?"
Since Margo purchase her optimal consumption bundle, the
marginal utility per dollar consumed on dance lessons must be equivalent to the
marginal utility per dollar paid on dance shoes. The marginal utility per
dollar spent on dance lessons is 100 utils per lesson, where $50 per lesson is equivalent
to 2 utils per dollar. The marginal utility per dollar expended on dance shoes
therefore has to equal 2 utils per dollar. Since the marginal utility of a pair
of dance shoes cost 300 utils per pair, the value of a pair of shoes should be
$150 per pair, so that 300 utils per pair/$150 per pair is equal to: 2 utils
per dollar.
