Answer:
1.- Without Retrospective effect
2.- No as it comes from a change in estimations not an accounting error.
3.- yes. It will give a full explanation about the reasons to extend the useful life.
4.- Depreciation expense for 2021: 60,000
Explanation:
1.- The change in the useful life does not represent an accounting error. It comes from the estimation process.
800,000 - 160,000 x 2 = 480,000 book value at beginning 2021
480,000 / 8 new useful life = 60,000 depreciation per year.
Answer:
engaged in health promotion at the highest level of organizational commitment
Explanation:
As it is mentioned in the question that ReNaPro Inc i.e is a multinational marketing agency that provided its employees a health educational program. In addition, it also regularly offers health promotions and offered incentives.
So here ReNaPro engaged in the promotion of health for the highest level of organisational commitment
Answer:
Yes the company must recognise the effects of this ruling.
Explanation:
As provided the law suit was initiated in the year 20x2, because of the activity happened in April 20x2.
Accordingly, company was already prepared for a liability of $100,000.
Whenever an event that occurs after the balance sheet is a mere confirmation to what was expected on balance sheet date, or is in alignment with things on record on the balance sheet date, it shall be provided in the balance sheet of that year.
In the given case the law suit was pending on the balance sheet date and was recorded as a liability then, now after the declaration by the judge, the additional liability of $20,000 shall be provided in the financial books of year 20x2.
Answer: They are personal consumption, business investment, government spending, and net exports.
Explanation:
