Answer:
Please see my answer below.
If you like my response you can mark it as brainliest.
If you have any doubts (no joke) you can reach out to me in the comments.
Explanation:
<em><u>The endosymbiotic theory states that some of the organelles in eukaryotic cells were once prokaryotic microbes. Mitochondria and chloroplasts are the same size as prokaryotic cells and divide by binary fission. Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA which is circular, not linear.</u></em>
1) False. Scientists may predict something but realize a difference soon after before the test, so they could definitely change the hypothesis if they want. It’s only AFTER the experiment they cannot. Because a hypothesis is like a “guess” as to what’s going to happen, right?
2) False. A hypothesis can’t be “valid” because it’s literally a prediction.
3) True. Especially if you’re doing a chemistry lab, it’s really important things are done in order or else the product might result as something else you were expecting, or can be very dANGEROUS
4) True. The conclusion must be based on data because it’s the observation that was seen.
Hope this helps!! I could have answered in short form but I just wanted to make them understandable:)
Your answer would be D. The possible combinations of alleles in offspring based on the parents genetic makeup. The punnet square is basically used to determine what the outcome of an offspring would be.
Answer:
I'm not sure exactly what your supposed to do but a,b and c are all correct but d is false.
