The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the <u>right to petition.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the constitution is looked into, it is revealed that the right to access to the courts is nothing but one of the aspects of the First Amendment’s right to petition the government for redress of one’s grievances. This can be easily seen as it is stated here, similar philosophy governs the approach of groups or citizens to administrative agencies which can both be seen as creatures of the legislature, and limbs of the executive, and to all the courts which are the third branch of the government.
Thus, it is more than implied that the right of petition is extended to all departments of the government including the courts. Thus, making it an aspect of the "right to petition".
"During both periods, Congress passed laws restricting the civil liberties of American citizens that met with overall public support" is the one statement that <span>explains how the Red Scare of the 1920s and the Red Scare of the 1950s were similar. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "A".</span>
Answer:
in State constitutions.
Explanation:
State constitutions are the set of rules and laws that govern the states and counties of the United States.
There is the national constitution, which governs the entire country, and the state constitution, which is prepared by each American state with its own laws and guidelines, but always following the precepts provided for in the national constitution. This document is subject to changes and amendments that guarantee updates to the envisaged laws.
Therefore, any internal government authority will govern a region based on the laws provided for in the national and state constitution.
Hi !
A is the correct answer
(it refers, I think to the division of Christian church between Catholic church and Orthodox church....)
bye
