Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
Six nights.
1. Saturday night
2. Sunday night
3. Monday night
4. Tuesday night
5. Wednesday night
6. Thursday night
Pickles chips are 4
Etdbxvxhchcv
(a) If the particle's position (measured with some unit) at time <em>t</em> is given by <em>s(t)</em>, where
then the velocity at time <em>t</em>, <em>v(t)</em>, is given by the derivative of <em>s(t)</em>,
(b) The velocity after 3 seconds is
(c) The particle is at rest when its velocity is zero:
(d) The particle is moving in the positive direction when its position is increasing, or equivalently when its velocity is positive:
In interval notation, this happens for <em>t</em> in the interval (0, √11) or approximately (0, 3.317) s.
(e) The total distance traveled is given by the definite integral,
By definition of absolute value, we have
In part (d), we've shown that <em>v(t)</em> > 0 when -√11 < <em>t</em> < √11, so we split up the integral at <em>t</em> = √11 as
and by the fundamental theorem of calculus, since we know <em>v(t)</em> is the derivative of <em>s(t)</em>, this reduces to
Answer:
The question that you have posed is rather interesting. However, it indicates a misunderstanding of the nature of civil/human rights as they are currently framed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The key thing to recall is that human and civil rights are, for the most part, individual rights, as opposed to group/societal rights. See, for example, the USA Bill of Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Universal Declaration, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Therefore, there is no greater societal sum equation to assess when looking at high rights. Indeed, individuals from minorities are often given special protections within human rights treaties/regimes.
However, it should not be forgotten that many rights are not inalienable, for example the right to family life, or freedom of expression. In these instances the right may be legitimately violated, if, on balance it is required to protect another individuals human right (note that it's individual as opposed to societal), or if it is deemed proportionate to violate that right (eg, to detain an individual because they have breached a provision of criminal law). But, it must be noted that this has nothing to do with minorities or majorities.
The often cited reason for this formulation is that the majority of the human rights treaties mentioned above emerged following the atrocities of the Second World War. In this regard, it must be recalled that one of the underlying philosophical beliefs of he Nazi regime related to the greater good of society, with it being perfectly permissible to violate the rights of one in order to further the welfare of others.
