He actions taken by the presidents weren't<span> similar </span>in any respect<span>. The </span>nearest<span> similarity is that </span>each<span> began with </span>a technique<span> to encourage civilians to follow their plans. In Ford's </span>set up<span>, he </span>down the number of money<span> in circulation </span>whereas<span> carter increased interest rates and deregulated businesses. </span>I feel<span> Ford had </span>the higher<span> policy </span>as a result of there have been<span> no major jumps in expansion or </span>the task market<span>, </span>whereas<span> all of Carter's measures were ineffective</span>
Because of the vote system of USA. It is dual, that means that there are always two parties that are the best and between them, the winner takes it all...
The Marshall Plan<span> was an American initiative to aid Europe, in which the United States gave $17 billion in economic support to help rebuild European economies after the end of World War II.</span>
Many banks had invested in the market and faced significant shortfall; several faced insolvency. The Crash also prompted a run on gold deposits, further reducing the amount of deposits banks had on hand. As a result, banks curtailed their lending activities, contributing to an economic slowdown.
