Question

Olive, the owner of Olive’s Orchard, contracts to sell its harvest to Pure Foods, Inc. Later Olive refuses to perform. Pure Foods files a suit to enforce the contract. Olive and Pure Foods are in a state that does not recognize the doctrine of unconscionability. To defend successfully against enforcement of the contract on similar grounds, Olive might rely on traditional notions of a. ​materiality. b. ​mistake. c. ​value. d. ​fraud.

Answer 1

Answer:

D)fraud

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed about Olive, the owner of Olive’s Orchard, contracts to sell its harvest to Pure Foods, Inc. Later Olive refuses to perform. Pure Foods files a suit to enforce the contract. Olive and Pure Foods are in a state that does not recognize the doctrine of unconscionability. To defend successfully against enforcement of the contract on similar grounds,. In this case, Olive might rely on traditional notions of a fraud. Fraud can be regarded as an act of deception which is intentional to deprive those that fall for it their legal right. It is activities that gives the perpetrator an unlawful gain or to deny a victim their right. It is carried out by people to get financial or personal gain in an unlawful manner. Some types of fraud that are common are are tax fraud, bankruptcy fraud. as well as credit card fraud,