Answer is 7.b because of the angles
I would prefer to solve this in a decimal form
I will show this to u in 2 ways
1:.75::X:2.25
(1*2.25)/.75x
2.25/.75x
X=3
2.25/.75=3
when we divide the number of hours played by hors for one game we get the number of games that could be played
Answer:
keiko- x
imelda- x+ 36
Sarah- x- 38
Step-by-step explanation:
- keiko is x since we have not been given his number of boxes.
- because imelda's number of boxes was 36 <em>more </em><em>than </em>keiko's, you will add the x which is for keiko and 36 for imelda(x+36).
- and sarah's number of boxes will be x-36 because we have been told her number of boxes is 38 <em>fewer </em><em>than </em> keiko's.
Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean is greater than 100
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1</u>: We state the hypothesis and identify the claim
and
(claim)
<u>Step 2</u>: Calculate the test value.


<u>Step 3</u>: Find the P-value. The p-value obtained from a calculator is using d.f=39 and test-value 1.126 is 0.134
<u>Step 4</u>: We fail to reject the null hypothesis since P-value is greater that the alpha level. (0.134>0.05).
<u>Step 5</u>: There is enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean is greater than 100.
<u>Alternatively</u>: We could also calculate the critical value to obtain +1.685 for
and d.f=39 and compare to the test-value:
The critical value (1.685>1.126) falls in the non-rejection region. See attachment.
NB: The t- distribution must be used because the population standard deviation is not known.
can u type out the question because its hard to see sorry