Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Corresponding scores before and after taking the course form matched pairs.
The data for the test are the differences between the scores before and after taking the course.
μd = scores before taking the course minus scores before taking the course.
a) For the null hypothesis
H0: μd ≥ 0
For the alternative hypothesis
H1: μd < 0
b) We would assume a significance level of 0.05. The P-value from the test is 0.65. The p value is high. It increases the possibility of accepting the null hypothesis.
Since alpha, 0.05 < than the p value, 0.65, then we would fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, it does not provide enough evidence that scores after the course are greater than the scores before the course.
c) The mean difference for the sample scores is greater than or equal to zero
So Katelyn bought 5.68 pounds of peaches. And one pound of peaches cost $1.49. So that would mean that we would have to multiply the pounds of peaches she bought, with how much each pound costs. 5.68 × 1.49 = ?
Once you multiply these two decimals, you would get 8.4632. So she spent $8.4632 on 5.68 pounds of peaches. You would multiply the two decimals to find how much she spent in all.
The factor of three is six factor of two is to 3 is three factor of two is 22 is four and poster of four is 22 Answer
Answer:
tysm!
Step-by-step explanation:
follow me on youtubē & tiktök Yktv.yania1
please
