Answer:
integrated programs are usually way more effective than programs that are not integrated
Explanation:
According to my research on different marketing techniques, I can say that the efforts need to be integrated because integrated programs are usually way more effective than programs that are not integrated. This is because integrated efforts will reach a wider audience which will lead to more sales.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
If Division X refuses to accept the $19 price internally and Division Y continues to buy from the outside supplier, the company as a whole will be:_________.
c. worse off by $28,600 each period.
Explanation:
The $28,600 loss the company incurs is from the lost contribution that Division Y's purchase of Division X's parts could have brought to the company if it buys parts inhouse. This is calculated as follows:
Division X's variable cost per unit = $17
Division X's selling price to outside customers = $23
Division Y's offered buying price = $19
The contribution = $2 ($19 - $17)
Answer:
C. Employees value the rewards or incentives that are being offered
Explanation:
Let's see the different options for answer...
<u>A. Performance measures are to be linked to the individual's goals</u>
No. Even if the performance measures should be linked to the individual's goals, just the mere existence of such KPI is not sufficient to motivate employees. There has to be some performance reward attached to it.
<u>B. Employees are given very broad performance goals</u>
No. To get a good performance and motivate employees, they must be given clear goals and objectives.
<u>C. Employees value the rewards or incentives that are being offered</u>
Yes. Even if you have good performance measurements, with realistic goals, the employees won't be motivated to reach those goals if the reward doesn't worth the effort.
<u>D. Employees are given limited resources to meet their goals</u>
No. They won't be motivated if they don't think they have the means to achieve those goals.
Answer:
option (C) - 6.11%
Explanation:
Data provided :
Coupon rate one year ago = 6.5% = 0.065
Semiannual coupon rate = 
= 0.0325
Face value = $1,000
Present market yield = 7.2% = 0.072
Semiannual Present market yield, r = 
= 0.036
Now,
With semiannual coupon rate bond price one year ago, C
= 0.0325 × $1,000
= $32.5
Total period in 15 years = 15 year - 1 year = 14 year
or
n = 14 × 2 = 28 semiannual periods
Therefore,
The present value = ![C\times[\frac{(1-(1+r)^{-n})}{r}]+FV(1+r)^{-n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=C%5Ctimes%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281-%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D%29%7D%7Br%7D%5D%2BFV%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D)
= ![\$32.5\times[\frac{(1-(1+0.036)^{-28})}{0.036}]+\$1,000\times(1+0.036)^{-28}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%2432.5%5Ctimes%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281-%281%2B0.036%29%5E%7B-28%7D%29%7D%7B0.036%7D%5D%2B%5C%241%2C000%5Ctimes%281%2B0.036%29%5E%7B-28%7D)
or
= $32.5 × 17.4591 + $1,000 × 0.37147
= $567.42 + $371.47
= $938.89
Hence,
The percent change in bond price = 
= 
= - 6.11%
therefore,
the correct answer is option (C) - 6.11%
Answer:
B. Improved adjustment to technological changes.
Explanation:
Vertical Integration: It is a strategy to gain competitive advantage by taking complete control over a few stages of production or distribution. The company implements vertical integration to reduce the cost of production, reduce dependence on others, improve the quality of the product, etc.
In the given case, the company pursuing vertical integration can gain market power over its competitors through improved quality, reduction in cost, and reduction in operation cost, however, it does not improve adjustment to technological changes.
