Answer: B. Maintaining a steady dividend is a key goal of most dividend-paying companies.
Explanation:
Companies that pay dividends prefer in general, to maintain a steady dividend overtime. This does not necessarily mean that they will pay the same amount of dividend but rather that they will pay out dividends as within a certain percentage range of the net income.
Companies do not prefer to cut dividends so as not to send the wrong message so A is wrong. Share repurchases reduces agency costs so C is wrong. Short term fluctuations in cash flow are not the key favor in determining dividend policy as the company might still pay out the same regardless so this is wrong as well. Option B is the best answer.
Answer:
The amount that Lena will invest in fund B would be $4000.
Explanation:
Given information -
Amount invested in fund A - $6000
Return earned on fund A - 6%
Let us assume amount invested in fund B be x
Return earned on fund B - 1%
Return on both funds together - 4%
Let us assume the total amount of fund invested be ($6000 + x)
Now using simple equation , we will take out the value of x which is the amount invested in fund B -
$6000 X 6% + x X 1% = 4% ( $6000 + x )
= $360 + .01 x = $240 + .04 x
= $360 - $240 = .04 x - .01 x
$120 = .03 x
x = $120 / .03
= $4000.
Answer:
$54,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what the amount of Human Resources cost allocated to the Assembly Department is:
Using this formula
Human Resources cost allocated to the Assembly Department=Human Resources budgeted costs* Human resource percentage
Let plug in the formula
Human Resources cost allocated to the Assembly Department=$90,000 x 60%
Human Resources cost allocated to the Assembly Department = $54,000
Therefore Using the step-down method and assuming the Human Resources Department is allocated first, the amount of Human Resources cost allocated to the Assembly Department is:$54,000
Answer:
Lloyd needs to increase his witholding tax to $1,560 this year in order to avoid the underpayment penalty .
Explanation:
As a rule, a citizen can maintain a strategic distance from an underpayment of punishment if their retention and evaluated assessment installment measure up to or surpass one of the two safe harbours
90% of current expense risk = 90% × $11,350
= $10,215
100% of past assessment risk = $15,900
Since his(Lloyd) retention is not equal to or exceed $10,215 or $15,900
Llyod should expand retaining or make payment this year in order to stay away from underpayment punishment
= $10,215 - $8,655
= $1,560