Ray is a shareholder of a small company. When the director falls to undertake an action it falls under derivative suit.
Explanation:
- Derivative suit is referred to as a law suit that is brought by the shareholder in behalf of the company against the third party.
- If in a company the employees, the directors as well as the officers are not ready to file a complain against the third party then the shareholder has the right to file a complaint against the third party.
- Derivative suit is normally filed by the shareholder when there is a mismanagement in the company. To stop the illegal work this action is being taken.
Answer:
Product 1 - $36
Product 2 - $ 96
Product 3 - $66
Explanation:
The accounting standard for Inventory under IFRS IAS 2 requires that inventory be recognized at cost which includes all the cost incurred to bring the item of inventory to a state or place where the item of inventory becomes available for sale.
These costs includes cost of purchase, freight, Insurance cost during transit etc.
Subsequently, inventory is to be carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
The NRV is the Selling price less the cost to sell.
Given
Product 1 Product 2 Product 3
Cost $36 $ 106 $ 66
Selling price $ 88 $ 168 $ 118
Costs to sell $ 9 $ 72 $ 26
NRV $ 79 $ 96 $ 92
Answer: Machine B because it has the lower Present Value
Explanation:
<h2>
Machine A</h2>
= Present Value of income - Present Value of Costs
Present value of Income;
Sold for $5,000 after 10 years.
= 5,000/ (1 + 8%)^10
= $2,315.97
Present Value of Costs;
Purchased for $48,000.
Maintenance of $1,000 per year for years.
Present value of maintenance= 1,000 * Present value factor of annuity, 10 years, 8%
= 1,000 * 6.7101
= $6,710.10
Machine A Present Value
= 2,315.97 - 6,710.10 - 48,000
= -$52,394
<h2>
Machine B</h2>
No salvage value.
Present Value of costs
Purchased for $40,000.
Present value of maintenance = (4,000 / (1 + 8%)^3) + (5,000 / ( 1 + 8)^6) + (6,000 / ( 1 + 8%)^8)
= -$9,567.79
Present Value = -40,000 - 9,567.79
= -$49,568
Under the condition that country X can manufacture cars more cheaply. An absolute advantage devours in a country if it makes good over alternative country and uses a smaller amount of wealth to yield that good. The result of a country’s natural legacy is the absolute advantage. Another example is extracting oil in Saudi Arabia is pretty much just a matter of drilling a hole. Generating oil in other countries can is essential substantial exploration and costly technologies for drilling and extraction if certainly they have any oil at all. The United States devours about the richest farmland in the world which manufacture it at ease to grow corn and wheat than in many other countries. Guatemala and Colombia partake environment particularly suitable for growing coffee. Chile and Zambia have about of the world’s richest copper mines. As some have claimed that geography is destiny. Chile will bargain copper and Guatemala will harvest coffee and they will trade. When each country has a product others necessity and it can be manufactured with fewer resources in one country over another then it is easy to visualize all parties do good from trade. Thinking about trade just in relations of geography and absolute advantage is incomplete. Trade actually happens because of comparative advantage.
These are examples of <u>work-related</u> characteristics
