Answer:
operant conditioning
Explanation:
The condition that looks at the type of behavior where it is controlled by the consequences.
Answer:
The possible answers are:
A
. Yes, because his actions constituted an unlawful operation of the construction equipment.
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
C. No, because at most he could be found guilty of criminal negligence.
D. No, because he must have been aware that his conduct would cause the damage to the trailer in order to be found guilty of reckless damage.
The correct answer is:
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
Explanation:
The worker should be found guilty, since he was aware of being intoxicated from the beginning of the action, knowing in advance that when operating the heavy construction equipment there would be a great threat for the people and properties around. Besides, he was also aware about the alarming signs, due to the fact that he could not reach the dum truck normally, he had to jump the fence to reach it, increasing the risk with his actions.
Answer:
here is the answer:)
Explanation:
What did the Stamp Act tax?
The British needed to station a large army in North America as a consequence and on 22 March 1765 the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act, which sought to raise money to pay for this army through a tax on all legal and official papers and publications circulating in the colonies.
hope this helped.
Answer:
It's either A or B, but I think B is more suitable.
Explanation:
Reasons for my answers.
A: the A.O.C had only one branch of government, the Congress, and it controlled the military, foreign affairs, and borrowed money.
B: Under the A.O.C, the federal government was weak.
C: The government had no power to impose taxes under the A.O.C.
D. The A.O.C did not prevent individual states from having their own constitution.
