1) Solving in terms of h
V = lwh <em>Divide both sides by h</em>
<em />
So rearranging that equation we can find h, in terms of V, and l and w.
If we want to solve in terms of l, or w, we'll proceed similarly to isolate the variable we want on the left side, and the other terms on the right side.
Answer:
The answer is D
Step-by-step explanation:
took the test<//3
Answer:
1/x-2; domain is the set of all real numbers except 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Answer:
Net worth is defined as:
Assets - Liabilities.
Assets are what you own.
Liabilities are what you have to pay.
So, home + truck + investments are assets.
Likewise, mortgage + student loans + credit cards are liabilities.
Doing the math, Susan's net worth is
Assets - Liabilities
$143,392.90 - $98,077.12 =
$45,315.78
Susan's net worth is $45,315.78
Good luck!
