Answer:
The correct answer B) The volumes are equal.
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of a disk of revolution at any x about the x- axis is πy² where y=2x. If we integrate this area on the given range of values of x from x=0 to x=1 , we will get the volume of revolution about the x-axis, which here equals,
which when evaluated gives 4pi/3.
Now we have to calculate the volume of revolution about the y-axis. For that we have to first see by drawing the diagram that the area of the CD like disk centered about the y-axis for any y, as we rotate the triangular area given in the question would be pi - pi*x². if we integrate this area over the range of value of y that is from y=0 to y=2 , we will obtain the volume of revolution about the y-axis, which is given by,
If we just evaluate the integral as usual we will get 4pi/3 again(In the second step i have just replaced x with y/2 as given by the equation of the line), which is the same answer we got for the volume of revolution about the x-axis. Which means that the answer B) is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
-2, -8/3, -10/3, -4, -14/3
Write as multiples of 1/3.
-6/3, -8/3, -10/3, -12/3, -14/3
This is an arithmetic sequence where the first term is -6/3 and the common difference is -2/3.
Therefore, the recursive formula is:
aᵢ₊₁ = aᵢ − 2/3, a₁ = -2
It depends on the question
Answer:
The p value for this case can be calculated with this probability:
Since the p value is higher than significance level we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is significantly less than 0.1
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=310 represent th sample selected
X=28 represent the subjects wrong
estimated proportion of subjects wrong
is the value to verify
represent the significance level
t would represent the statistic
represent the p value
System of hypothesis
We want to test the claim that less than 10 percent of the test results are wrong ,and the hypothesis are:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info we got:
The p value for this case can be calculated with this probability:
Since the p value is higher than significance level we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is significantly less than 0.1
i will rate you 8
Step-by-step explanation:
thank you for your point