Answer:
Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by
studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.
Explanation:
A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality. He can then arrive at a broad generalization.
A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument. A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails. It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.
In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated. For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.
Answer:
Explanation:
"Did you hear about David getting hit by a two-wheeler?" Rahul said, walking by Varun. "What!? When?" He gasped in shock. "He was hit by a motorcycle on his way back from school yesterday," Rahul answered. "How does someone do that?" He asked, seeming genuinely confused. "He was crossing the road at a zebra crossing and I guess a speeding person jumped traffic and he got hit." "Is he hurt?" Varun wondered. "Just a fractured arm." Varun sighed and realized "He won't be able to do the Inter-school swimming contest next week. And he would have won too," "Yeah you should have seen how upset he was"
Answer:
the largest spoken language in the world
