The issue with democratic systems versus a republic or a constitutional monarchy, whereas there is a Magna Carta, or otherwise any guaranteed protection of the people's rights is that it can be voted away to a majority.
An unelected king that has total control over his subjects with no restraint of power or protection for the people will make none the difference but that in a democracy that person was elected to have total control over his subjects.
The disadvantage, or advantage, of a democracy, is that the majority will always rule over the minority. Regardless of there protected rights.
They called them the den of traitors.
The correct answer is d. They went to work in war-related industries to fill in for the men who were away at war.
During World War II, millions of men were drafted to serve in the United States military. This left millions of jobs open on the homefront. The result was a significant increase in the amount of women working in war-related industries.
The enormous need for guns, ammunition, tanks, etc. resulted in women all over the country breaking traditional gender roles by working in war-related industries. This movement was spurred by propganda, with one of the most famous ones being the Rosie the Riveter campaign.
Answer:
Federalist Papers to help people to understand the US Constitution.
Explanation:
There are 85 essays in Federalist Papers which were printed in New York newspapers while New York State was deciding whether or not to support the U.S. Constitution. These are a series of eighty-five letters written to newspapers in 1787-1788 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, urging ratification of the Constitution Other newspapers outside New York also published the essays as other states were deciding to ratify the Constitution. In 1788, the papers were published together in a book called The Federalist. As of today, the people still read the Federalist Papers to help them understand the Constitution.
Hamilton, who wrote about two-thirds of the essays has addressed the objections of opponents, who feared a tyrannical central government that would supersede states’ rights and encroach on individual liberties. All strong nationalists, the essayists argued that, most important, the proposed system would preserve the Union, now in danger of breaking apart, and empower the federal government to act firmly and coherently in the national interest. Conflicting economic and political interests would be reconciled through a representative Congress, whose legislation would be subject to presidential veto and judicial review.
Answer:yes
Explanation: as long as you come to a COMPLETE stop
