Realist and Liberal perspectives would agree that the international system is inherently anarchic
The notion that there is no supreme authority or sovereign in the world is known as anarchy in the study of international relations. There is no hierarchically superior, coercive authority that can settle conflicts, uphold the law, or regulate the system of international politics in an anarchic state. It is commonly acknowledged that anarchy serves as the foundation for international relations theory.
It is feasible for ordered ties between nations to be maintained in an anarchic international system, contrary to how anarchy is typically understood in the field of international relations. For the realist, liberal, neo- realist, and neo- liberal models of international relations, anarchy provides the underpinnings.
To learn more about Anarchy click here:
brainly.com/question/1133894
#SPJ4
The answer in here is Relationship behavior. The reason is that a high degree of buyer or seller dependence can lead to opportunistic behavior by one party at the expense of the other. As soon as the seller gets the attention and gets the buyers confidence then it enhances a lasting relationship even though it may be losing oportunistic behaviour. Relationship behavior focuses on establishing long term, mutually beneficial rela<span>tionships</span>
Answer:
bcoz the strong journalism is equal to the 100 week journalism . they can lead a country to better future.Only they can expose the bad or evil activity that are run in country. they can be the future
The Dark ages of Greece is considered to be the time period after the Mycenaean civilization had declined, which was around 1200 BC, and before the Archaic period of Greece, which was around 800 BC.
During those times it seems that a period of impoverishment ensued and very little is actually known. With that, we don't even know which were the ruling dynasties and kings in those times.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
you can't make white it is not possible
