Answer:
The lawyer would dispute that a button and a piece of cloth are not specific evidence to convict someone.
Explanation:
George Marsh was found dead near a car. he was shot and to find the person responsible, a search for evidence began. A button and a piece of fabric were found, which were used to convict the killer. The baton and fabric matched the suspect's coat, which was enough to convict him of the culprit.
However, this crime occurred in 1912, when fast fashion chains did not exist where several exactly the same clothes are manufactured, as today. In that case, if that were the judgment on George Marsh's assassination to happen today, the lawyer would contest the button and the piece of fabric as evidence, because many people can wear clothes that match the button and piece of fabric in question.
Where are the choices?
the answer could be that both parents are carrying the heterozygous genes. so let's say B is the dominant brown eye gene and b is the recessive blue eye gene. both parents could possess the Bb genotype, and hence by using test cross, Tim was that 25% chance where a child could inherit the bb genotype to have blue eyes
An increase in the number of wbcs in the blood
<span>Taking example on himself, Douglas states that education and environment are the factor for success, and that African-Americans are no more or less to be found possessing the right or wrong disposition as far as intelligence.</span>
