It focused on more technological advancements
Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long-run equilibrium because of the following reasons which include easy entry & exit, small player etc.
Perfect competition exists when there are many sellers, firms can easily enter and exit, products are identical from one seller to the next, and sellers are price takers.
A perfectly competitive firm must accept the equilibrium price at which it sells goods because it is a price taker.
A perfectly competitive firm will be unable to make any sales if it charges even a small amount more than the market price.
Furthermore, a perfectly competitive firm must be a very small player in the overall market, allowing it to increase or decrease output without affecting the overall quantity supplied and price in the market.
Hence, Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long-run equilibrium.
Learn more about Long-run equilibrium:
brainly.com/question/6275304
#SPJ4
<span>Which skills would be the most beneficial for a computer help desk technician?
</span>
<span>B. research skill</span>
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
Answer:
Fayolism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that the management of Mason Mills reflects the ideas and principles of Fayolism. This is a management theory developed by Henri Fayol, which states 14 principles explaining how management should communicate and lead their workers. Many of which state the importance of organization within the business in order for workers to know who to report to and keep everything running efficiently.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
