URGENT HELP !!! Find ledger and send me fast
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Let 
be the number of lower-level tickets sold, and 
the number of upper-level tickets sold.
Now, if the theater sells 350 tickets total, that means the number of lower-level and upper-level tickets that got sold should add up to 350, so one equation in the system is
You also know that the theater earns $10250 in sales, so if each lower-level ticket costs $35, and each upper-level ticket costs $25[/tex], this means
represents the amount of money made from selling lower-level ticekts, and 
represents the amount of money made from selling upper-level tickets. You get the second equation in the system,
So the system is
Any one of the methods listed in the second part works in solving this system (though I'm not sure what "variable" refers to), but I think substituting involves the least work.
Solve the first equation for either variable; I'll choose.
Now substitute this into the second equation for, then solve for .
So 200 upper-level seats were sold. Meanwhile, since, this means
so that 150 lower-level tickets were sold.
Now, if the theater sells 350 tickets total, that means the number of lower-level and upper-level tickets that got sold should add up to 350, so one equation in the system is
You also know that the theater earns $10250 in sales, so if each lower-level ticket costs $35, and each upper-level ticket costs $25[/tex], this means
So the system is
Any one of the methods listed in the second part works in solving this system (though I'm not sure what "variable" refers to), but I think substituting involves the least work.
Solve the first equation for either variable; I'll choose
Now substitute this into the second equation for
So 200 upper-level seats were sold. Meanwhile, since
so that 150 lower-level tickets were sold.
Answer:
The financial advisor is not using percentage properly.
Percentage loss=2%
Step-by-step explanation:
original amount invested=$11000
By the end of the first year, there was a decrease by 30% over the original amount.
This implies that the amount invested at after the end of the first year or at the beginning of the second year
=$7,700
This amount has increased by 40%
=$10,780
The financial advisor is not using percentage properly.
This is because the decrease was on the original amount meanwhile the increase was not on the original amount. The increase was rather on an amount less than the original amount .
Since the original amount invested is greater than the amount at the end of the second year, there was a loss
Hence percentage loss