1. The statement is true
Export taxes are paid by the exporters. These taxes include customs and shipment changes a as a as well.
2. The statement is uncertain
We cannot make out which industry will use technological spril overs and which industry will not use it.
3. The statement is false
Child employment is in non-tradeable sector for most of the poor countries.
4. The statement is true
low GDP per capita mean the country does not have enough output per person. It is not able invest in the human capital of the Country. Each of facilities like education, hospitality is another result of low GDP per capita and thus, eventually. Low GDP per capita lead to child labor because these children and their parents does not have money & basic facilities and that is why choose this option.
Non-tradable sectors are composed of production, distributive alternate, repairs, shipping, accommodation, meals services sports (GHI), actual property activities (L), enterprise offerings (MN), and public administration (OPQ). All sorts of tradable sectors can create productivity increase
Learn more GDP per capita here:-
brainly.com/question/18414212
#SPJ4
Answer:
$3,762
Explanation:
The computation is as seen below
Total cost when the production is 9,900 units
Direct materials $8,316
Direct labor $11,187
Variable overhead $12,474
Total $31,977
But,
Their new cost on supplier offer is
= $2.85 × 9,900 units
= $28,215
In the case when the order is accepted, the net income would increase by
= $31,977 - $28,215
= $3,762
The legal issue that Susan's father was advising her about is: Caveat emptor.
<h3>What is Caveat emptor?</h3>
Caveat emptor is a Latin words which means let the buyer beware before buying or purchasing a property.
Hence, Susan's father advising her about Caveat emptor which is why he told her facts to obtain a thorough inspection before buying or purchasing the real estate.
Learn more about Caveat emptor here:brainly.com/question/14565508
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answers are: greater than; less than.
Explanation:
In the perfect competition model, the nature of the scale returns poses serious problems, whatever the case considered. Sise assumes that the returns of scale are increasing, the supply of companies is infinite; if they are constant, the offer is null, infinite or indeterminate (equilibrium case); if they are decreasing, the profit of the companies is strictly positive in the balance '. In the latter case, if they could do so, companies would be interested in dividing themselves, without any limit, into entities as small as possible.
