1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
german
3 years ago
8

What prevents a state from raising the legal voting age? A. most state constitutions B. the Declaration of Independence C. Execu

tive Order #2504 D. the 26th Amendment to the Constitution
History
2 answers:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the 26th amendment

Explanation:

vredina [299]3 years ago
6 0

Correct answer:  

<h2>D. the 26th Amendment to the Constitution</h2>

The 26th Amendment lowered the voting age from 21 to 18.

Context/details:

There were strong protest movements going on in America during the 1960s, leading up to 1971 when the 26th Amendment was passed by Congress and ratified by the states.  Protests against the Vietnam War were active on college campuses across the country, with communication between students and media reports being a big part of the story.  Part of those protests were the demands of young people chanting, "Old enough to fight, old enough to vote."  Since 18 was old enough to be drafted to fight in the war, young people argued for their right to vote as full citizens.

The 26th Amendment was passed by Congress on March 23, 1971.  It was ratified by the states faster than any other amendment, achieving ratification by July 1, 1971.

The 26th Amendment is worded as follows:  

  • <em>Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.</em>
  • <em>Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.</em>
You might be interested in
The Cold War began due to confrontations over post-WWII decisions made about which part of the world?
densk [106]

Answer:

<h2>D. Europe</h2>

Explanation:

The western members of the Allies (Britain, France and the United States) and their wartime partner in the alliance, the Soviet Union, were at odds over how Europe would be governed after the war.  The Western democracies wanted free and open elections in the countries of Eastern Europe coming out from under Nazi domination.  The Soviet Union wanted states allied and aligned with it to prevent any future aggression against the USSR (like how Germany had invaded).  The USSR ended up heavily influencing the Eastern European countries to align with communism, bringing them behind what Winston Churchill called "The Iron Curtain."

The situation of Germany itself was also a tension spot.  Germany was divided between the four Allied nations (Britain, France, the USA, and the USSR).  The British, French and American sectors combined their governance of West Germany and West Berlin.  This prompted the Soviets to blockade Berlin (located within the Soviet sector of East Germany).  The American side responded with the Berlin Airlift to keep West Berlin free of Soviet control.

All of these events were fueling tensions in the Cold War that was developing between the USA and its democratic allies and the USSR and its communist partners.

6 0
3 years ago
Germany was forced to agree to the "War Guilt Clause" as part of the Treaty of Versailles. This meant --
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

Germany took full responsibility for starting World War I and agreed to pay the Allied Powers war reparations

5 0
3 years ago
6th grade stuff ! HELP ME PLEASE AND THANK YOU!
Arte-miy333 [17]

                         THE MIDDLE EAST INFORMATION

"The most widely accepted theory for why the Middle East is loaded with oil is that the region was not always a vast desert. Scientists say that 100 million years ago this area was instead a massive body of water known as the “Tethys Ocean.” Rivers that fed into this ocean were loaded with nutrients, which lead to conditions that were conducive for a diverse variety of microscopic life to materialize in the water.

As life is never one to pass up an opportunity, these conditions resulted in billions and billions of miniscule marine creatures swimming about. Algae, bacteria, and whatever else nature came up with eventually accumulated on the ocean floor in thick layers that grew to be miles deep. As more layers formed on top of these over time, the lower parts were compressed. Those compressed aquatic corpses transformed into oil. The oil was captured in place on the seabed by thick layers of salt.

As the land in the modern Middle East region rose due to tectonic activity, the Tethys Ocean receded. What remained in its place was the sandy, dry Middle Eastern desert. But deep under the sand, the oily remains of billions of microscopic lifeforms still lie buried. Today, we suck these remains to the surface and use them to power our automobiles, in addition to many other gizmos of modern life."

                                     HAWAII INFORMATION

"There is no oil or gas activity in Hawaii due to limited crude oil and natural gas reserves. ... For example, in 2013 there was an increase in the price of natural gas, making it economical to extract natural gas that previously had been too expensive to extract."

Take this information of both the Middle East and Hawaii to form sentences of a basic claim. (Why does the Middle East have oil but not Hawaii?) Then, take the evidence I've given you and reason with it. Give brief explanations.

You said no links, so I'll just give you the names of the websites to cite. You can read through the websites if you need more information.

Third Coast Auto Group "Why is there a lot of oil in the Middle East?"

Ballotpedia "Oil and gas production in Hawaii"

Hope this helps! Have a fantastic day!

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true? a. Your textbook is exactly the same as a Western Civilization textbook from 1979, even one writ
Allisa [31]

Answer:

b. History is a dynamic field in which new sources and new perspectives challenge what we thought we knew about the past.

Explanation:

Among the given statements about history, the correct or true one is sentence b. This sentence states that<em> "history is a dynamic field in which new sources and new perspectives challenge what we thought we knew about the past."</em>

History may refer to the information of facts about past events. But there is no fixed nature of history. Rather, it changes with time, where new sources or information may arise and lead to new ways of interpreting or viewing it. Therefore, it is a dynamic field where new developments challenge the old ones, at times changing the perspectives and providing new insights into what we thought or knew about the past.

7 0
3 years ago
Ano ano sng mga katangiang ipnagkakaiba ng bawat babasahing popular​
Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer:

magkakaiba ang tema, ending at setting nito

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Pls Help Me For 30 Points!
    11·2 answers
  • What role did camels play in the distribution of goods in Africa?
    14·1 answer
  • What were two ways that the industrial revolution caused europeans to took for new colonies
    13·1 answer
  • Sa aling senaryo ipinapakita ang papel ng heograpiya sa sistema ng pamamahala ng mga<br> tao?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the north and south react differently to the news of the attack on fort Sumter
    14·1 answer
  • Why was John Jay criticized when he came back from England?
    12·1 answer
  • Where were the first citites in North and South America built ?
    5·1 answer
  • What party was created to go against Andrew Jackson?
    9·1 answer
  • Please answer my question​
    14·1 answer
  • How did a Regan's Military buildup and policy Mikhail Gorbachev help contribute to the collapse of the Soviet Union?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!