People often have their opinions been challenged several times. A time when I were challenged by a perspective that differed from your own was when i was in the university.
- A lecturer of mine taught us a topic and there was a statement he made that was quite different from what I was taught at home. This is because the topic he was teaching was familiar to me. I decided to raise tell Him my own perspective of what he said during the question and answer time, but he was still adamant that his own deductions were right.
- At first, I was not not happy by his response or perspective. But I have to look at it from another angle. Not Everyone may agree with you or your perspective but that does not mean you or them are wrong.
A change in perspective can result in a big a positive but it also has its own challenges when responding to one's views. Through the act of engaging in different opinions and different ideas, and shifting one's perspective along with others, one can learn.
Learn more about Perspectives from
brainly.com/question/13107415
Answer:
Yoruba/African tribe
, Ancient Crete fertility rites and the Dionysian Cult Dance.
Explanation:
All of the cultures mentioned, in exception of the Christian circle, believe or believed that dances were capable of inducing a trance-like state in which the dancer may be possessed by a spirit or god. In the Ancient Greece culture, both the Dionysian cult and the Fertility rites involved dancing, drinking and entering in trance-like states. The Yoruba african tribe does as well, where music is very important.
Answer:
inalienable rights are rights that can't be taken away
Explanation:
Inalienable rights are rights that cannot be given away. Americans typically read the commitment to inalienable rights to mean that these are rights no government can take away.
The difference between “immigrate” and “emigrate” is that “immigrating” is the act of entering a foreign country to live while “emigrating” is the act of leaving a country to live in another.
Answer: At about the same time as.
In his study, Turiel interviewed children using hypothetical situations that resembled the types of struggles raised by the real-life events. The way that these children reasoned was very similar across real and hypothetical moral issues. Thus, we can say that children's ability to tell whether a character in a story has violated moral rules develops at about the same time as their ability to understand them in real life.
