A tyrant would want to convince the people not to insist on democracy. He could use arguments such as:
Democracy will make the country weak and vulnerable to outside attacks
Democracy will not be an efficient form of government because people would argue too much
His rule is better because it provides stability
DEPENDS ON WHAT GRADE YOU ARE IN RIGHT NOW
In this scenario, Keith appears to be having normal thought processes.
His behavior would not be considered delusional because his concern about his boss not inviting him to lunch was explained, and it made sense to him. If he was experiencing delusional disorder, he would not be able to shake off the feeling, even with a logical explanation.
Answer:
- Good faith exception.
Explanation:
'Good Faith Exception' is demonstrated as the legal tenet which proffers the exemption or exception form the exclusionary rule as the IVth Amendment of U.S. Constitution states that 'if the evidence collected by the police through unlawful searches or seizures but done with a good faith belief, it could be admissible at the trial'.
As per the given description, <u>'good faith exception'</u> demonstrate the exemption to the exclusionary rule because the exclusionary rule usually states that evidence collected unlawfully or by violating the right to privacy would not be admissible during the trial but the 'good faith' exception states that 'if the law enforcement officers believe that their actions are in 'good-faith' it can be admissible by the court which marks the exception.
