Answer:
(a) Linear model

Subject to:



(b) Standard form:

Subject to:




Explanation:
Given

Solving (a): Formulate a linear programming model
From the question, we understand that:
A has a profit of $9 while B has $7
So, the linear model is:

Subject to:



Where:


Solving (b): The model in standard form:
To do this, we introduce surplus and slack variable "s"
For
inequalities, we add surplus (add s)
Otherwise, we remove slack (minus s)
So, the standard form is:
So, the linear model is:

Subject to:




Answer:
A) $21,068
B) $1,525.24
C) $280,457.24
Explanation:
The amount of the discount = face value - market value = $300,000 - $278,932 = $21,068
Amount of interest recognized on December 31, year 1 = ($278,932 x 7%) - ($300,000 x 6%) = $19,525.24 - $18,000 = $1,525.24
Carrying value of the bond liability = $278,932 + $1,525.24 = $280,457.24
A capitalist system will depend on fair completion among
business with the following; driving lower quality, higher quality or other
choices in which will affect the system. With this, it is namely referred to as
the right to fair competition which is being done by people competing in
business.
Answer: The marketing slice would be three times as big as the accounting slice.
Explanation:
The total number of majors are:
= 2 + 4 + 6 + 8
= 20 majors
The proportions of the majors are:
Accounting = 2 / 20 * 100% = 10%
Finance = 4 / 20 * 100% = 20%
Marketing = 6 / 20 = 30%
Insurance = 8 / 20 = 40%
Notice how marketing takes 30% and Accounting takes 10%.
Marketing will therefore take up three times as much slices as Accounting.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided it can be said that the investment adviser should recognize that the customer's request is not within the scope of the adviser's expertise and retain an outside investment counsel. A "passive" investment manager believes in results generated by a diversified portfolio over one of individually selected stocks. Since the individual wants the adviser to choose the stocks, then the adviser has the responsibility to step back due to his lack of expertise selecting an individual stock portfolio and advise the individual to retain another investment advisor.