Answer:
Option B, OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT.
Explanation:
Scope of employment refers to where an employee was and what actions were being undertaken when the injury took place. If the employee was within the scope of employment, then the employer would likely be held responsible. But, if the employee was outside the scope of employment, then it is harder to prove the employer was negligent.
Within the scope employment means the injury took place; on or near work premises, during business trips, within a company's vehicle, while running an errand for the employer.
Outside the scope employment means the employee was not conducting any official business when the injury took place.
In the case of Francis, although he was on an official errand, he stopped in the middle of delivery route to have lunch with his friends which was not part of his official errand and he got injured while doing so.
Therefore, Francis would normally be considered to be acting: OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT.
Answer:
$7.2 and $10
Explanation:
The computation of the standard cost per unit for direct material and for direct labor is shown below:
Direct materials standard cost per unit is
= 3 lbs × 2.4
= $7.2
And, Direct labor standard cost per unit is
= $15 × 40 ÷ 60
= $10
All the other information which is mentioned in the question is not relevant. Hence ignored it
Depends on the bank that issued your card. You might want to talk to your card issuer's customer support.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Answer:
Explanation:
The $35,000 that will be needed in 3 years is a future value (FV).
This is an ordinary annuity, and it is asking for the recurring payment (PMT)
Using a financial calculator, input the following;
Future value; FV = 35,000
Total duration ; N = 3*12 = 36 months
Interest rate; I = 3.4%/12 = 0.2833%
One time present cashflow; PV = 0
then compute recurring payment ; CPT PMT =924.86