Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
I would say true, but I'm not sure. Answer at your own risk.
Answer: World War II
Fascism developed in Italy primarily under the leader Benito Mussolini. It is associated with three political parties led by Mussolini: the Fascist Revolutionary Party (PFR) founded in 1915, the succeeding National Fascist Party (PNF), from 1921 to 1943 and the Republican Fascist Party from 1943 to 1945.
Italian fascism promoted Italian nationalism, syndicalism and national expansion. At the same time, it opposed liberalism and Marxist socialism. It also shared the racial overtones of Nazi ideology, and considered Italy the glorious descendant of Ancient Rome.
Answer:
<em>significant others </em>
Explanation:
<em>In psychology, </em><em>the term "significant other" is referred to as someone who gives very great importance to a person's well-being or life. It is described as an individual or individuals that possess a strong influence on a person's self-concept. It defined a specific relationship between two different people who share a bond and do not possess a married relation but carry a joint responsibility for oneself and the other.</em>
<em>In reference to the question above, the given statement refers to the "significant others".</em>
<em> </em>
