Answer:
The biggest impediment to an investigation is the removal or loss of a piece of evidence
Explanation:
Answer:
The Supreme Court held that Premier Duplessis' cancellation of Roncarelli's liquor licence violated the Rule of Law because this action constituted an abuse of the Premier's powerful position.
Explanation:
Ur welcome
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
Answer:
society considered as a community of citizens linked by common interests and collective activity.
