Answer:
Such results only tell us how well one is programmed to regurgitate mostly useless information, mostly in regards to one of 7 kinds of intelligence.
This can be a good indicator on whether or not a person will be able to handle even higher amounts of regurgitation of information at the university level. The hope is that students will major in a study that will at least expose them to the tools of critical thinking, which is mostly limited to the hard sciences.
“Learners” who score high can will feel overblown grandiose feelings, and see themselves as superior to those with lower scores, regardless of their future accomplishments (or lack of them). “Learners” who score low will tend to feel humbled and maybe depressed, in that they are typecast as being somehow unable to be much of a future contributor to society.
Fortunately, a significant number of people at ANY point of the spectrum of such scoring to see how well trained a monkey they are, realize the absurdity of such scoring, and go on to find out where they DO excel in one of the other 7 kinds of intelligence. They often end up contributing MORE to society, once they find there “gift” where they “score” much higher
Explanation:
Thank you to all that came in this winter coldness. You were all very brave to have come to....
Answer:
Explanation: Because her shoes were worn out and she she needed better shoes for the long journey.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
almost all children dont like their parents while growing up. we know that Anne has no reason to be jealous of her mother. We know that Anne also doesnt dislike everyone she meets because she likes several of the people shes living with. We also know that Mrs. Frank isnt mean to everyone, so C is the answer.
A long time ago. In 6th grade. I am 10th grade
