Answer:
C). There are consequences when we treat fairness as a standard of living.
Explanation:
The inference that can be drawn from the given paragraph would be 'the outcomes of treating fairness as a standard of living.' <u>The descriptions like 'Fair...limits, inhibits, stifles, and restricts, all under the guise of balance and equality' supports this inference</u>. However, the author states that 'leaders are obligated to do the right thing' yet when they attempt to navigate fairness, they are considered 'arbiter of public opinion and captive to the politically correct. ' The conclusion itself substantiates this inference that 'fair exists itself as mere justification or rationalization.' Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
If you are having difficulties deciding on what to do, it’s always best to do what you believe is the right thing. If you decided to do nothing, you could ultimately be making the wrong choice.
Example: You’re at the grocery store and you dropped a can of soda in the isle. You feel bad and you aren’t sure if you should report it to an employee so they can clean it up or if you should just walk away and pretend like nothing happened. Now if you do nothing, someone might come and slip on the soda and hurt themselves badly (the worst thing). But if you decided to tell an employee, you’re making the right choice because you’re preventing that future person from slipping.
I hope this makes sense!
I think the best answer to this question is the people in a specified place that could affect the growth and character of a person. If a person is from an area who is crime and poverty is more prone, the tendency is it can influence itself to do bad things or do the same as its environment doing in everyday lifestyle
Answer: A counterclaim is another claim that would make another statement either true or false.
<span>"Sunset Song," about a rural Scottish girl growing to womanhood in the years before World War I, is one of the great director Terence Davies' best films: an example of old school and new school mentalities coming together to create a challenging and unique experience. The movie feels as if it could have been made in the 1940s, were there no such thing as censorship. There's frank sex and violence, and the movie doesn't shy away from the nastier aspects of life in that time and place. But there's never a feeling that Davies is rubbing our noses in suffering, because the film displays so much empathy for its characters and such awareness of the social, political and historical forces that hover beyond the edges of their consciousness.</span>
