<span>Without placing too implicit faith in the account above given, it must be agreed, that if a worthy pretext for so dangerous an experiment as setting houses on fire (especially in these days) could be assigned in favor of any culinary object, that pretext and excuse might be found in roast pig.</span>
<span>indirect characterization
This shows the character's feeling and ideals, which gives the reader a view of how the character thinks. The quote doesn't say anything directly about the character, but the reader can see how he feels about the Burmese (positively) versus the British (negatively but that he's not willing to show it.</span>
<span>Person vs. Self and Person vs. Environment</span>
In the passage Brutus claim to Cassius that is he going to be able to see thing that are not there and Cassius replies that he will work as a mirror for him and help him to see the things he don’t see and support that he is honest and trustworthy telling Brutus several bad behavior that would make him doubt of Cassius and finish saying “then hold me dangerous” meaning that if Brutus see Cassius doing that things, only then he could think that Cassius is dangerous.
