he became prime minister? (sorry im not sure but i wanted to help)
Answer:
membership in NATO
Explanation:
The majority of the post-communist Eastern European countries changed significantly after the end of the Cold War and the fall of the Soviet Union. Most of these countries (apart from Belarus) became democracies, reformed their economies and made them market economies, opened up to the world, and started to become more Westernized and lean toward the West as their ally. They also tried to make everything in the power to become part of NATO, as it was the strongest military alliance that was going to guarantee their safety, especially from the very frustrated Russia. Unlike them, Russia remained the arch enemy and rival of NATO, so it did not took advantage to get into it, but instead did everything to stop some nations of becoming its members and still does.
The answer is B. It is the control exercised by consumers preference on the production of goods.
Answer:
The time he spent as an undergraduate at Columbia College and then working in Manhattan in the early 1980s surfaces only fleetingly in his memoir. In the book, he casts himself as a solitary wanderer in the metropolis, the outsider searching for a way to “make myself of some use.”
Explanation:
i think im sry if its wrong
Answer: As others have noted, the “right to privacy” has virtually no Constitutional textual basis. The Justices in Griswold v Connecticut couldn’t even agree to which parts of the Constitution they could point to, and ended up saying it was some short of vague “penumbra of an emanation” of the Bill of Rights, but couldn’t explain what that meant or on what specific text it was based. The “right of privacy” was concocted out of thin air, in the shadows, by a SCOTUS coterie which wanted to protect people’s right to use contraceptives in their homes, but couldn't find any legitimate Constitutional basis to proclaim such a right. So they made it up. The right action by SCOTUS would have been to acknowledge that the Federal Government has no jurisdiction over contraception or abortion, those not being enumerated to the Federal Government by the Constitution and therefore denied to it by the 10th Amendment. SCOTUS should have sent the matter back to the States and directed all Federal Courts to but out. But it didn’t, leading to all the confusion and controversy that has ensued.
Explanation:
