Answer:
The orrect option is A "I and III only"
Explanation:
<u>Statement (I)</u> is true as a result of to work out the speed of come is commensurate with the risks concerned as it doesn’t create any intellect to stay the Funds in portfolio.
<u>Statement (III) </u>is true as a result of it is sensible to isolate funds they need undesirable returns or an excessive amount of association with alternative investments
Answer:
The answer is: remain the same
Explanation:
The marginal utility of a good or service is how much better we feel when consuming an extra unit of that good or service. For example if we are very thirsty, the marginal utility of consuming a can of Coke is very large, but once our thirst is quenched, an extra can of Coke will not provide use with that much satisfaction as before.
If the price of a substitute good increases, the marginal utility of the good whose price didn't change, will remain the same.
Let's go back to the Coke example. An extra can of Coke will give me 5 more satisfaction units (I'm assuming I can measure satisfaction) and an extra slice of pizza will give me 7 more units of satisfaction. If the price of Coke increases from 50 cents to $1, its marginal utility will decrease. I will buy more pizza because the satisfaction I get from drinking Coke is now smaller.
THE PROGRAM MANAGER will approve the realignment. The program manager is able to approve this realignment because a reprogramming action is not required. If a reprogramming action is required, that meas the change will be substantial, in this case the program manager will not be qualified to approve the realignment.
An externality is defined as the cost or benefit that affects a group when the group did not choose to receive that cost or benefit. This results in either a position or negative consequence based on what happened to a third party that was not origionally involved.
Someone who wouldn't choose to pay for a certain good or service but who'd get the benefits of it anyway is the best definition given to be the answer to this question.
<span>Past studies have found that new products fail in the market around 35-40 percent of the time. Here are some remarkable examples:
</span><span>Iridium Satellite Telephone - -$7 bil
Mobile ESPN - $150 mil
Apple Newton PDA - -$400 mil
RJR Premiere Cigarette - -$325 mil and an additional loss of $125 mil
RCA Videodisk Player - -$450 mil</span>