Answer:
Predictive validity.
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests with the Psychology Aptitude Test (PAT) scoring system; the predictive validity is a way of calculating how a determined score on a test predicts scores on a certain criterion measure. In other words, this is a correlation between tests and ratings; as shown in the example provided by the exercise: "Their scores were later compared to their performance in the introductory psychology course, and high scores on the PAT were related to high grades in the course".
The statement is true that the state of Arizona can sue the state of California over Colorado river water to the United States Supreme Court and can hear the case for the first time. In fact there was a case that happened in 1982 and was decided on 1983.
<span>The correct answer is "something that I could never will to be universal law."
Immanuel Kant was known for being a German Philosopher, he is a well known Philosopher in the field. His known argument was about the human mind's creation of experience, which structures morality in humans.</span>
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. Young drivers are more willing to take risks compared to other drivers because <span>they have the fastest reaction time since their senses are still working 100%.</span>
Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
