Both strategies aim to convey and process knowledge between and within the organization. The top-down approach for sub-categories to gain insights at the senior management level breaks down a system.
This is a great tool to help managers identify areas of improvement using quota and monthly matrix goals. There are flaws in this strategy, employees are not involved in the process and managers do not understand the full impact of the changes made.
Morality can be affected because this strategy is motivated by fear and encouragement. The bottom line is that in some cases it is more complex, although employees feel motivated to provide more authority and quality work. The information is processed to a minimum and communicated to management.
This may help in some areas because administrators may not fully understand the process. I should use the military as an example for a top down strategy.
It works on the battlefield when there is no time to discuss or motivate employees. Top down is used when there is a slight change in environmental factors.
B) liable to Niki under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
Explanation:
In contract law, promissory estoppel refers to a theory that when you make a reasonable promise but later you decide to back down, the other party may sue you in order to force you to fulfill your promise.
This theory has been upheld by the Supreme Court in Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. 501 US 663 (1991). So a reasonable promise will have the same binding effect as a contract.
What are the following job to choose from? the range of jobs in that field is very large. He could be a Research Veterinarian which would help him improve his knowledge of his field. He could also be an Asst. Veterinarian Consultant. That would help him get experience working with highly trained and educated professionals. Another job in which he could have while going to school could be a Diagnostics Lab worker. This would give him a deeper understanding of how and why different treatments are made.
