All categories

3 years ago

In what situations is top-down planning likely to be superior to bottom-up emergent strategy development

Business

1 answer:

Marianna [84]3 years ago

5 0

Answer is given below :

Explanation:

Both strategies aim to convey and process knowledge between and within the organization. The top-down approach for sub-categories to gain insights at the senior management level breaks down a system.
This is a great tool to help managers identify areas of improvement using quota and monthly matrix goals. There are flaws in this strategy, employees are not involved in the process and managers do not understand the full impact of the changes made.
Morality can be affected because this strategy is motivated by fear and encouragement. The bottom line is that in some cases it is more complex, although employees feel motivated to provide more authority and quality work. The information is processed to a minimum and communicated to management.
This may help in some areas because administrators may not fully understand the process. I should use the military as an example for a top down strategy.
It works on the battlefield when there is no time to discuss or motivate employees. Top down is used when there is a slight change in environmental factors.

You might be interested in

A co-worker who has to leave work early to deal with a personal matter asks that you complete some time-sensitive paperwork and

stich3 [128]

Answer:

intervene and tell the supervisor you had assumed responsibility for the paperwork and forgot

Explanation:

The golden rule is based on a principle of reciprocity and it states that one should treat others the way they want to be treated.

Different religions overtime have the same principle embedded in their doctrines.

In the given scenario where a coworker told you to compete some work for him before leaving and you failed to do so, when the coworker is being reprimanded you should take responsibility for the paperwork and say you forgot.

This is only fair on your coworker seeing it wasn't his fault the work was not done.

Also when you treat people fairly you can also be expected to be treated fairly too.

4 0

3 years ago

Mathematics VII

dsp73

Answer:

6 inch + 6 inch = 1 foot, so you will get 16, 6 inch sections!

Hope this helps!

Have a nice day!

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Marketing intermediaries add value and create efficiencies by:

Kisachek [45]

Marketing intermediaries add value and create efficiencies by:

a. providing convenience.

c. reducing the number of exchanges between producers & buyers

d. performing necessary activities such as storage and transportation

<h3>What are marketing intermediaries?</h3>

Marketing intermediaries can be defined as organizations that are saddled with the responsibility of transporting goods and services from producers (manufacturers) to businesses, and from businesses to consumers (B2C).

This ultimately implies that, marketing intermediaries are able to add value and create efficiencies by providing convenience and performing activities such as transportation and storage.

Read more on marketing intermediaries here: brainly.com/question/17367610

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

Marketing intermediaries add value and create efficiencies by:

a. providing convenience

b. eliminating activities such as transportation & storage

c. reducing the number of exchanges between producers & buyers

d. Performing necessary activities such as storage and transportation

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

53. [LO 11.4] At the beginning of year 1, Lisa and Marie were equal shareholders in LM Corporation, an S corporation. On April 3

Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

• Lisa $16,611

• Marie $15,070

• Shelley $8,391

• George $9,933

Explanation:

Daily allocation of $50,000 net reported net income

= $50,000/365

= $137 per day

• Income allocated to Lisa would be ;

Since Lisa and Marie are equal shareholders; meaning both would have 50% stake each in the business. Moreover, since Lisa sold half of her stake I.e 50% ÷ 2 = 25% to Shelley, her share would be;

(50% × 120 × 137) + (25% × 245 × 137) = $16,611

° Note Jan 1 to April 30 is 120 days, while the balance is 365 days - 120 days hence 245 days

• Income allocated to Marie would be;

Since Marie have 50% stake in the business and also sold her entire interest to George, her share will be;

50% × 220 × 137 = $15,070

°Note Jan 1 to August 8 is 220 days

• Income allocated to Shelley would be;

Since Shelly bought 25% out of the 50% stake that Lisa have in the business, her share will be;

25% × 245 × 137 = $8,391

°Note 245 days will be applied to Shelly's share which represent the number of days she purchased part of Lisa's interest in the business. I.e. 365 days - 120 days = 245 days

• Income allocated to George would be;

Since George purchased the whole 50% of Marie's stake in the business, his share of profit will be;

50% × 145 × 137 = $9,933

° Note 145 days will also be applied to George which represent the balance of days with which he purchased Marie's whole stake in the business. I.e 365 days - 220 days = 145 days

4 0

3 years ago

You are considering an investment in a mutual fund with a 4% load and an expense ratio of 0.5%. You can invest instead in a bank

irakobra [83]

Answer:

a. r > 8.69%

b. r > 7.225

Explanation:

Missing question <em>"b. hat annual rate of return must the fund portfolio earn if you plan to invest for 6 years to be better off in the fund than in the CD?"</em>

<em />

Mutual fund wealth index after N years = (1 - front load)*(1+r-expenses)^N

CD wealth index after N years = (1+rate)^N

a. Investment for 2 years

(1 - front load)*(1+r-expenses)^N = (1+rate)^N

(1 - 0.04)*(1+r-0.005)^2 = (1+0.06)^2

0.96*(1+r-0.005)^2 = 1.1236

(1+r-0.005)^2 = 1.17041667

<em>We remove square from both sides</em>

(1+r-0.005) = 1.17041667^(1/5)

(1+r-0.005) = 1.08185797

r = 1.08185797 - 1 + 0.005

r = 0.0869

r = 8.69%

r > 8.69%

b. If investment is for 6 years

(1 - front load)*(1+r-expenses)^N = (1+rate)^N

(1 - 0.04)*(1+r-0.005)^6 = (1+0.06)^6

0.96*(1+r-0.005)^6 = 1.41851911

(1+r-0.005)^6 = 1.47762408

<em>We remove square from both sides</em>

(1+r-0.005) = 1.47762408^(1/6)

(1+r-0.005) = 1.06723648

r = 1.06723648 - 1 + 0.005

r = 0.07223648

r = 7.22%

r > 7.225

7 0

3 years ago