Answer:
Comedy as a Profession is a great example.
Explanation:
The science of it is related to the psychology of what makes people laugh.
If studied, one would realize that there are certain things that are bound to make people laugh (all things being equal). An example is when a person makes fun of themself to an audience.
To explain this, scientists have stated that it is inherent in humans to laugh at the misfortune of others. However, this is just a theory and does not explain why we laugh at other kinds of comedy.
A plausible explanation (which is more recent in the parlance of psychology) is that people also laugh when certain expectations are defied in a very witty manner.
As a professional stand-up comedian, knowing all the rules and tricks is just one part of the coin. Being able to, either by practice or repeated efforts during practice, internalize these principles, practice them and effectively use them is the artistic part of the picture.
There those who are gifted naturally with a principle thought process that elicits laughter from others, would be termed hilarious. However, to make a living out of comedy, one would need to fully understand the principles and practice to deliver them as naturally as possible.
Another paradigm to the art of comedy is that, it has to be very witty. Wit many times may come with an element of suprise... a new angle that was previously "unthought" of.
Cheers!
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is probably one of the greatest issues that cartels around the world face, since their agreements are difficult to maintain because it is very difficult to control the price and output policies of its members.
Even the largest cartel in the world, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), has problems when it comes to monitoring the petroleum output of its members. When some countries need more money they just increase their petroleum production even if the rest of the cartel doesn't agree with it.
Answer:
The answer is "Option B".
Explanation:
Inferential statistics was its process through which data collection is used to conclude the property or even an implicit wave function. Its analysis infers these same features of inhabitants. Its purpose is to use statistical strategies to determine important assumptions regarding sample size, and other choices were wrong which can be defined as follows:
- In option A, it defines the average of the given values, that's why it is wrong.
- In option C, It is used to0 describes a number of samples that's why it is wrong.
Solution:
Sales Price $115,000 - BV $80,000 = $35,000
Gain on Sale /8 years = $4,375
Annual Amortisation of Unrealised Gain over Expected Useful Life of the Asset
Parent's Depreciation $84,000 + Sub's Depreciation $60,000 - Annual amortisation $4,375 = $139,625
