<span>B. CONCEDE is your answer. Hope it helps.</span>
Answer:
Even in hiding, Anne was just like a<em> normal teenager</em> who also dreamed about her future. She even wanted to become a professional journalist and would also write about things not related to the Nazi occupation. This is a "dramatic irony" because Anne already knew that it was impossible to achieve her goals, especially in her situation that they were hiding. Despite what was happening around here, the stages of puberty was evident in her feelings for "Peter."
Explanation:
The question is related to "The Diary of a Young Girl," written by Anne Frank. It tackles her happenings in life during the<em> Nazi occupation in Netherlands.</em>
Although they've been hiding for a long time, they were still found and arrested in <u>1944. </u>They were then sent to the concentration camps and Anne died of <em>"typhu</em>s" while in the camp.
[I]t is impossible for the collectivity to undertake the direct settlement of all the controversies that may arise.
Answer: Option D.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The claim that has been given in this option has been supported by an example that has been given by the author in the final paragraph. The evidence is given of the time when Peter wrongs Paul in the passage.
The example given shows and demonstrates why is it weird and absurd to imagine that the entire collectivity would be able to examine the circumstances of the controversy and to adjudicate it and to make a formal judgement and the decision about a matter which is disputed.
A. Wasn't.. This is because if you seperatevthe contractioninto two words it is was not, this would make the sentence be "Wally was not capable of lifting the heavy box."
If you were to do the same thing with weren't it would sound like "wally were not capable of lifting the heavy box." This does not make sense because "wally" is singular (so is "was not") and "were not" is pleural.
Hope this helps