The question seem to be incomplete but I found the complete question which is:
If you are performing this test on an unknown organism, why is it a good idea to run simultaneous tests on known phenylalanine-positive and phenylalanine-negative organisms?
Here is the Answer:
Inoculation of a positive control and success from it includes certainty to negative outcomes on an unknown organism. That is, you know the test is working effectively, so the negative outcome is most likely precise. Without the positive control, there is dependably a component of uncertainty whether the negative outcome is a genuine negative or a false negative. performing the test on a known phenlalanine-negative organism is valuable in that it exhibits what a negative outcome looks like.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
A virus is a dangerous cell. And cells are alive. The nucleus in the cell gives it it's "life" by controlling what the cell does at all times. The nucleus is like our brain or heart, you could say,
Answer:
First, rain will have to occur. The lake and surfaces will have water in them, after that it will a while for the surface to evaporate into water vapour, after that the water vapour will condense into water droplets and when the clouds are too heavy because of too much water droplets in them, it will start to rain again and this cycle will keep going on continuously.
