As he committed crimes that can be tried in State court, the last Texas Court to hear John's case is the <u>Texas Supreme Court. </u>
<h3>Which court is John's final court?</h3>
In every state there exists a judicial system that is similar to the federal system because there is a Supreme Court.
The state Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in a state which means that the final court for John in the state of Texas is the Texas Supreme Court.
Find out more on supreme courts at brainly.com/question/2324092.
Answer:
not required to hear the case.
Explanation:
The United States Court of Appeals is also known as the circuit courts that are the intermediate appellate courts. The US courts of appeals are one of the most powerful as well influential courts in America.
In the context, Boyd flies a case against Cathy in the federal district court where Cathy loses the case. She then makes an appeal to the circuit courts or the United States Court of Appeals for a second circuit but she loses again. Now if Cathy moves to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and makes an appeal, the Supreme Court is not required to hear Cathy's case as she already made an appeal in the Court of Appeals of U.S. and The court has made his judgement.
Answer:
Yes I agree and yes it is fair to give money to another state to build roads because it decrease power centralisation and promotes unity in action.
Explanation:
- This directly relates to the system of checks and balances.
- It is the system designed to reduce the effects of centralisation of power by ensuring that no single authority has complete control over decisions and promotes cooperation.
- For Example: The tripartite system practiced in different countries where judicial, legislative and executive aspects of government has equal authorities in amending or removing the law.
- In regard to projects like building roads other states can cooperate with one state to improve its infrastructure for equitable development.
Answer:
Its that already the whole question?
I dont understand it srry :(
Answer:
The four main traditional rules are real, demonstrative, documentary, and testimonial. These laws determine what evidence must or must not be considered by the trier of fact in reaching its decision.
Explanation:
The federal rules of general provisions, judicial notice, presumptions, relevancy and its limits, privileges, witnesses, opinions and expert testimony, hearsay, authentication and identification, contents of writing, photographs and recordings. They are needed because they govern the evidence at civil and criminal trails in US federal trial courts. The current rules were initially passed by congress in 1975, after years of drafting by the Supreme courts.
