1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Iteru [2.4K]
3 years ago
14

Macho went on the land of Bowleg uninvited. Macho has filed a trespass action claiming damages of $100. After listening to the s

tories of the parties, the court concluded that Macho was 30% responsible for the trespass. How much will Macho recover for this action? (see Civil Procedure and Remedies Code, Sec. 33.001)
Law
1 answer:
STatiana [176]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

He will recover $70 because he was 30% responsible according to the court.

Explanation:

The Civil Procedure and Remedies Code on its section 33.001 states about proportionate responsibility. And it clearly states that in damages actions the claimant may not recover if it's more than 50% responsible. In the case given Macho is 30% responsible so he would recover 70% of the damages claimed that is the responsibility of the other part. Both parts have a certain degree of responsibility in the claim at the eyes of the court so, they compensate Macho´s claim of $100 according to the percentage the court gave to each one.

I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in
The phrases below summarize the primary goals of a political party.
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer: Democratic Party

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When two cars approach a four-way stop, which car has to yield the right-of-way?
skad [1K]

Answer: D

Explanation:

Im not sure but i think thats the answer

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
was OJ Simpson ever convicted of murder in a court? What differences are there between the court where he was convicted and the
Svet_ta [14]

Explanation:

ןעכככגגסהחןיכאאסצתצנע

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors help explain why the police solve so "few" crimes?
Mrac [35]

Answer: d. All of the above

Explanation:

Some crimes are quite complicated in structure to solve as they leave little evidence to enable the police to capitalize on and solve.

Police response is also reactive which means that they cannot prevent crime per say, they can only try to solve it. This puts them at a disadvantage because they are essentially a step behind the criminals which means they have to do more to catch up than the criminal has to do to escape.

Police powers are also quite limited especially in a democratic nation like the United States because they have to abide by certain rules. For instance, if a search and seizure is illegal, regardless of if incriminating evidence is found, the criminal has a good chance of being freed. These rules make solving crimes difficult sometimes because some crimes cannot be solved conventionally.

3 0
3 years ago
Letter to your friend telling him about your latest school trip​
juin [17]

Lets see how good my typing skills will come to use now...

Hey friend!

I recently went on a school trip to Washington D.C. It was amazing and full of iconic monuments. I wished you were there, but your not in my school. You should have seen the white house! It's more than three stories high, though I'm not sure why its called a house because it looks more like a building. I hope you can come visit by sometime this year, maybe we could take a one hour drive down to Washington D.C sometime. Well anyways, see you friend.

Sincerely,

     Whatever You Want Your Name To Be.

Brainliest or Heart if helpful for whatever your doing. You can always add more, and just combine it with other answers.

Also did this in 3 minutes so....your welcome.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Define, describe, compare, and contrast common-law crimes and statutory crimes. Be sure to provide examples.
    12·1 answer
  • If the house impeaches the president and he goes on trial in the senate. True or False
    8·1 answer
  • 5.
    10·2 answers
  • Is it true or false that the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to try certain cases, in addition to its havi
    15·1 answer
  • 1. What are three reasons why voting is important to democracy?​
    11·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly. Which participant of the criminal trial process is responsible fo
    5·1 answer
  • What did the USA Patriot Act empower law enforcement agencies to do?a. Convict U.S. citizens without trial.b. Wiretap and spy on
    9·1 answer
  • Do you believe lethal injection is more human than the electric chair, and why?
    10·2 answers
  • Why is it important to demonstrate a positive work attitude in the workplace?
    12·1 answer
  • Why has it been important to keep natural habitats such as the Great Plains free from wildfires?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!