Answer:
Social thinkers who misapplied Darwin's idea believed industrial corporations to be much more superior and hence should not have restricted its actions using laws that provided assistance to the poor people or those that regulate working conditions. These set of people believed that poor people actually made themselves so because they lack the character to be rich, stating that the poor always depended on the government to provide for them rather than practicing personal economics. This resulted to the government spending time to know the difference in poor people who deserves help and those who don't, rather than helping the poor in general.
Explanation:
Social thinkers who misapplied Darwin's idea believed industrial corporations to be much more superior and hence should not have restricted its actions using laws that provided assistance to the poor people or those that regulate working conditions. These set of people believed that poor people actually made themselves so because they lack the character to be rich, stating that the poor always depended on the government to provide for them rather than practicing personal economics. This resulted to the government spending time to know the difference in poor people who deserves help and those who don't, rather than helping the poor in general.
Well, uniting against a common enemy has always been a great unifier. Plus, literally fighting for freedom made every person fighting believe very deeply in their cause, and so they could overcome differences with each other for that cause.
Answer:
i kill a man that is the craziest conversation i have overheard
Explanation:
YOU!!!
Answer:
by suggesting that the king was bound to the will of the people as well as the law or by suggesting that the king was bound to the law as well as to God or by allowing for separation of powers between the king and his subjects. so the wrong answer is B
Explanation:
The English Bill of Rights drew on the ideas expressed in the Magna Carta by suggesting that the king was bound to the will of the people as well as the law. ... suggesting that the king was bound to the law as well as to God. allowing for separation of powers between the king and his subjects.
