<span>I this case, the loan is still valid and at that point Mike would be responsible for finding a way to pay the loan back as agreed upon in the contract. This is called co-signing, when two parties both sign for a loan together. Both parties are responsible for the loan and even though David cannot be found, the loan must still be paid and Mike would be held responsible for this.</span>
TRUE, If the fed undertakes expansionary monetary policy, it can return the economy to its original unemployment rate but the inflation rate will be higher.
Monetary policy is the macroeconomic policy set by the central bank. It involves the management of the money supply and interest rates, and is the demand-side economic policy adopted by national governments to achieve macroeconomic goals such as inflation, consumption, growth and liquidity.
Monetary policy refers to the measures taken by a country's central bank to control the money supply in order to stabilize the economy. For example, policymakers manipulate the money supply to increase employment, GDP, and price stability using instruments such as interest rates, reserves, and bonds.
Learn more about monetary policy here:brainly.com/question/13926715
#SPJ4
Answer:
(a) Yes. It is an opportunity cost of new job because the additional time he spent commuting is a cost, as he can utilize that time in doing something else.
(b) Yes. It is also an opportunity cost because if a person wants to join a new job then he have to give up his current job. So, the earning of $45,000 from his current job is the opportunity cost of accepting the new job.
(c) No. It is not an opportunity cost but it is an additional benefit from the new job because he is not sacrificing anything to obtain this benefit.
Answer:
the correct answer is a. more difficult than
Explanation:
Unlike Transaction exposure, economic exposure is difficult to predict and difficult to mitigate in an event of occurence, thus making it harder to manage than transaction exposure.
This is mainly because economic exposure can happen due to various macro economic factors and international political incidents.
Answer:
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
Explanation:
<u>For First stock </u>
Total dividend from first stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.32 * 2 = $0.64
HPR of first stock = (Total dividend from first stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($0.64 + ($31.72 - $27.85)) / $27.85 = 0.1619, or 16.19%
Annualized holding period return of first stock = HPR of first stock * Number 6 months in a year = 16.19% * 2 = 32.38%
<u>For Second stock </u>
Total dividend from second stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.67 * 4 = $2.68
Since you expect to sell the stock in one year, we have:
Annualized holding period return of second stock = The 1-year HPR for the second stock = (Total dividend from second stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($2.68+ ($36.79 - $34.98)) / $34.98 = 0.1284, or 12.84%
Since the Annualized holding period return of first stock of 32.38% is higher than the Annualized holding period return of second stock of 12.84%. the first stock will provide the better annualized holding period return.
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
