Answer:
The answer is $400,000
Explanation:
Quantity theory of money states that the quantity of money is directly proportional total spending in an economy.
Change in quantity of money = new deposits (which can also be new security) ÷ reserve requirements
The new security is $20,000
reserve requirements is 5 percent
Change in quantity of money is:
$20,000 / 0.05
=$400,000
Answer:
Each 1000 par value bond will sell at issuance for $110.71
Explanation:
A zero coupon bond is a bond that does not pay interest and is issued at a heavy discount which is a compensation for the interest payment. The value of the zero coupon bond today is calculated using the present value of the face value of zero coupon bond. The formula to calculate the present value of the zero coupon bonds is,
PV = Face value / (1+r)^t
As the required rate is quoted in annual terms, we will divide it by 2 to calculate the semi annual required rate and multiply the time (annual) by 2 to calculate the semi annual periods in 25 years.
Semi annual required rate = 9% / 2 = 4.5%
Semi annual periods (t) = 25 * 2 = 50
PV = 1000 / (1+0.045)^50
PV = $110.70965 rounded off to $110.71
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry for cost of goods sold is as follows:
Cost of goods sold Dr $841,300
To Finished goods inventory $841,300
(Being the cost of goods sold is recorded)
The value of cost of goods sold is
= $162,500 + $839,000 - $160,200
= $841,300
Here the cost of goods sold is debited as it increased the expense while the finished goods inventory is credited as it decreased the assets
Answer:
A) buy the product in Hong Kong and sell it in Shenzhen so eventually the price in Shenzhen will decrease and the price in Hong Kong will increase
Explanation: when the price of the product in Shenzhen reduces due to the low priced product being sold in same place the high priced is sold, this would even out the demands and the price of that in Shenzhen would be dragged down to be able to compete with that of the low priced.
Answer:
Jon's conclusion is not valid.
Explanation:
To a particular extent the tax to be paid by a person can be minimum 0. It can never happen that the tax is negative and tax department pays back to the client, with no tax liability.
Jon contends that from the previous year the tax paid by him is less by 150%, which cannot be true as the tax amount can be reduced by 100% making tax = 0.
Assuming tax paid last year = $100
Tax paid in current year = $100 - $100 
150%
= $100 - $150 = -$50
It means tax paid is negative $50, that concludes tax department paid $50 to Jon, which cannot be true.
Thus, Jon's conclusion is not valid.
