Answer:
Slaves
Explanation:
In Dred Scott vs Sandford case, the supreme court in 1957 slaves was not a citizen of United States and was never intended to be included in neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution. The opinion of the court on this matter was that blacks are not even included on the right to sue
The court further interpreted that, neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were included in the Declaration of Independence nor Constitution.
The answer is "<span>by writing an amicus curiae brief".
</span>
Companion of the court, or amicus curiae, briefs are regularly documented in re-appraising cases heard by the U.S. Supreme Court and state supreme courts, and also intermediate courts of bid. What's more, there is significant confirmation that amicus briefs have impact: Appellate courts regularly refer to them in issuing their choices.
They accused him that he was unfairly taxing them, that he monopolized the beaver trade in his favor, that he favored Native Americans over them, and that he used judicial services to his accord by placing ignorant people as judges.
Answer:
Rapid Growth of Population
Increase in Incomes
Deficit Spending for Development
Increase in Money Supply
Inadequate Agricultural Output
Inadequate Industrial Production
High-priced Imports
Explanation:
Congress relies on a committee system since they aren't allowed to become an expert on the bills that are proposed each year. The members in this committee are allowed to become an expert of any bill they are working on. Congress has around 200 different committees in progress at any given time. The correct answer is B.
