Answer: No,the company is not guilty.
Explanation: In the given case, Hines could not be considered guilty of price discrimination as the price charged from different shops was same. The free samples were distributed for the purpose of campaign and the discretion to which shop they want to provide lies completely with the company.
Price discrimination refers to the practice of charging different prices from different customer which the company have definitely not done.
Hence, Hines could not be charged of guilty of price discrimination.
Answer:
A) Product Differentiation
Explanation:
Product differentiation is referred as a strategy which companies or firms use to showcase the abilities which their products have and the competing product does not have. Some go as far as displaying an added advantage which their products have. Forms which this strategy can take may be through price of the product, reliability of the product or location of the product.
Answer:
First Financial would divide the $10,500 loan by the present value of annuity due of 1.
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
Present value of annuity formula is used for determining the amount of loan payment. Since the payments will be made at the beginning of each month, we will apply the formula for present value of annuity due. In order to determine the amount of monthly payment, we will divide the principal by the present value of annuity due of 1.
Marketers must weigh carefully the costs of additional information against the benefit resulting from it.
What are marketers?
A marketer is a person who advertises an organization's products and services. They identify the tactics that can increase sales and revenue while making sure that these tactics are in line with consumer demands and market demands.
Therefore,
Marketers must weigh carefully the costs of additional information against the benefit resulting from it.
To learn more about Marketers from the given link:
brainly.com/question/25369230
Answer:
Adjusting entry the company made to record its estimated bad debts expense:
Bad Debts Expense 29,300
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 29,300
Explanation:
The company uses the aging of receivable method to estimate uncollectible.
Estimated uncollectible would be $28,500
Before year-end adjustments, the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts had a debit balance of $800
Bad debts expense = $28,500 + $800 = $29,300
Adjusting entry the company made to record its estimated bad debts expense:
Bad Debts Expense 29,300
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 29,300
