1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mamont248 [21]
3 years ago
11

Assuming that the company has retained earnings of $90,000, all of which is to be paid out in dividends, and that preferred divi

dends were not paid during the two years preceding the current year, state how much each class of stock should receive under each of the following conditions: A. The preferred stock is noncumulative and nonparticipating B. The preferred stock is cumulative and nonparticipating. C. The preferred stock is cumulative and participating.
Business
1 answer:
Allisa [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Some information was missing, so I looked it up:

The outstanding capital stock of Edna Millay Corporation consists of 2,000 shares of $100 par value, 8% preferred, and 5,000 shares of $50 par value common.

A. The preferred stock is noncumulative and nonparticipating

preferred dividends = $100 x 2,000 x 8% = $16,000

common stocks = $90,000 - $16,000 = $74,000

Preferred dividends not paid to noncumulative preferred stocks are "lost" and will not be paid in the future.

B. The preferred stock is cumulative and nonparticipating.

preferred dividends = ($100 x 2,000 x 8%) x 3 years = $48,000

common stocks = $90,000 - $48,000 = $42,000

C. The preferred stock is cumulative and participating.

preferred dividends = [($100 x 2,000 x 8%) x 2 years] + $$25,777.60 = $57,777.60

common stocks = $90,000 - $57,777.60 = $32,222.40

When preferred stocks participate in the company's earnings, they receive an additional revenue proportional to the dividends received by common stockholders.

$32,222.40 / $250,000 (common stocks) = 12.8888%

$200,000 x 12.8888% = $25,777.60

You might be interested in
10. Crowding out effect Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of $13 billion raises the total deman
Lilit [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

Effect of crowding out:

The crowding out phenomena describes the economic phenomena in which an increase in government public spending leads to reduced or perhaps may eliminate of private investment.

Multiplier:

The multiplier represents the ratio of income to investment change.

Given that:

$13 billion increase in government spending will lead to a $52 billion

The rise in demand for goods & service will be the value of multiplier which is

= 52/13

= 4

To determine the multiplier using the formula:

Multiplier = 1 /( 1- MPC)

4 = 1/(1 - MPC)

4 (1 - MPC) = 1

(1- MPC) = 1/4

-MPC = 0.25 - 1

MPC = 0.75

Marginal propensity to consume = 0.75

6 0
3 years ago
Fred Hash worked for Van Stavern Construction Co. as a field supervisor in charge of constructing a new plant facility. Hash ent
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>

He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.

Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.

The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.

Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.

<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>

<em></em>

6 0
3 years ago
Park &amp; Company was recently formed with a $6,200 investment in the company by stockholders in exchange for common stock. The
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

a) $14,600.

Explanation:

The computation of the company total assets are shown below:

= Cash balance + supplies balance + equipment balance

where,

Cash balance =  investment amount + borrowed amount - paid amount for equipment

= $6,200 + $3,200 - $2,120

= $7,280

And, the other item values would remain the same

Now put these values to the above formula  

So, the value would equal to

= $7,280 + $1,120 + $6,200

= $14,600

4 0
3 years ago
"People who fight fire with fire usually end up with ashes," is a popular saying that can relate to upset customers.
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

This popular saying applied to an organizational environment, can refer to upset customers in the sense that if your customers make any complaints or complaints about your products and services, you, as a professional representing the company, must be well prepared and trained to deal with this adverse situation in a way that is not a "person who fights fire with fire and ends up with ashes", that is, you must be well prepared to respond to the customer's problem in a friendly, fast way and that brings solutions that do it. return, and not in a way where the customer feels that their complaint has not been resolved well and will not do business with the company again.

5 0
3 years ago
What do the income effect, the substitution effect, and diminishing marginal utility have in common?
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

They all help explain the downsloping demand curve

Explanation:

The options to the question wasn't provided. The complete question can be in the attached image.

The demand curve slopes downward from left to right. This indicates that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded.

Income effect is a change in quantity demanded when real income change. Quantity demanded increases when real income increases and decreases when real income falls.

Substitution effect says that consumers would substituite to the consumption of a cheaper good when the price of a good originally consumed increases.

Diminishing marginal utility states that as consumption increases, utility derived from consumption falls and quantity demanded falls.

I hope my answer helps you

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose you have $10,000 in cash and you decide to borrow another $10,000 at a 6% interest rate to invest in the stock market. Y
    12·1 answer
  • When interest rates on Treasury bills and other financial assets are​ low, the opportunity cost of holding money is​ _________,
    11·1 answer
  • During its first year of operations, Ivanhoe Company had credit sales of $2,781,600, of which $368,300 remained uncollected at y
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose a technological improvement has lowered the cost of manufacturing cell phone batteries. This would lead to in the supply
    8·1 answer
  • g Brief Exercise 186 For the items listed below, indicate whether the item is an asset, liability, or stockholders' equity item.
    9·1 answer
  • Pharoah Construction enters into a contract with a customer to build a warehouse for $870000 on March 30, 2021 with a performanc
    11·1 answer
  • Olivia owns a store with four employees and is taking Business 2425. She told her class that she tries to match the appropriate
    10·1 answer
  • You have a job at a real-estate agency in the small country of Dystopia, where you are paid 72,000 marks (the currency of Dystop
    7·2 answers
  • ordan Industries declared a $0.90 per share cash dividend. The company has 180,000 shares authorized, 61,000 shares issued, and
    15·1 answer
  • which pdp plan is designed for customers who are receiving extra help and need basic protection? quizlet
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!